mirror of
https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot.git
synced 2026-05-15 08:39:49 +00:00
Add extensive language support
This commit is contained in:
@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@
|
||||
title: Porting Large Datasets
|
||||
- local: using_dataset_tools
|
||||
title: Using the Dataset Tools
|
||||
- local: dataset_subtask
|
||||
title: Using Subtasks in the Dataset
|
||||
- local: language_and_recipes
|
||||
title: Language Columns and Recipes
|
||||
- local: streaming_video_encoding
|
||||
title: Streaming Video Encoding
|
||||
title: "Datasets"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,277 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Using Subtasks in LeRobot Datasets
|
||||
|
||||
Subtask support in robotics datasets has proven effective in improving robot reasoning and understanding. Subtasks are particularly useful for:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Hierarchical policies**: Building policies that include subtask predictions to visualize robot reasoning in real time
|
||||
- **Reward modeling**: Helping reward models understand task progression (e.g., SARM-style stage-aware reward models)
|
||||
- **Task decomposition**: Breaking down complex manipulation tasks into atomic, interpretable steps
|
||||
|
||||
LeRobotDataset now supports subtasks as part of its dataset structure, alongside tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
## What are Subtasks?
|
||||
|
||||
While a **task** describes the overall goal (e.g., "Pick up the apple and place it in the basket"), **subtasks** break down the execution into finer-grained steps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. "Approach the apple"
|
||||
2. "Grasp the apple"
|
||||
3. "Lift the apple"
|
||||
4. "Move to basket"
|
||||
5. "Release the apple"
|
||||
|
||||
Each frame in the dataset can be annotated with its corresponding subtask, enabling models to learn and predict these intermediate stages.
|
||||
|
||||
<img
|
||||
src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/lerobot/subtask-asset.png"
|
||||
alt="An overview of subtask annotation showing how frames are labeled with intermediate subtask stages"
|
||||
width="80%"
|
||||
/>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
<em>Figure: Overview of subtask annotation.</em>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
**Reference:** _Subtask-learning based for robot self-assembly in flexible collaborative assembly in manufacturing_, Original Article, Published: 19 April 2022.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dataset Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Subtask information is stored in the dataset metadata:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
my-dataset/
|
||||
├── data/
|
||||
│ └── ...
|
||||
├── meta/
|
||||
│ ├── info.json
|
||||
│ ├── stats.json
|
||||
│ ├── tasks.parquet
|
||||
│ ├── subtasks.parquet # Subtask index → subtask string mapping
|
||||
│ └── episodes/
|
||||
│ └── ...
|
||||
└── videos/
|
||||
└── ...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Subtasks Parquet File
|
||||
|
||||
The `meta/subtasks.parquet` file maps subtask indices to their natural language descriptions:
|
||||
|
||||
| subtask_index | subtask (index column) |
|
||||
| ------------- | ---------------------- |
|
||||
| 0 | "Approach the apple" |
|
||||
| 1 | "Grasp the apple" |
|
||||
| 2 | "Lift the apple" |
|
||||
| ... | ... |
|
||||
|
||||
### Frame-Level Annotations
|
||||
|
||||
Each frame in the dataset can include a `subtask_index` field that references the subtasks parquet file:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Example frame data in the parquet file
|
||||
{
|
||||
"index": 42,
|
||||
"timestamp": 1.4,
|
||||
"episode_index": 0,
|
||||
"task_index": 0,
|
||||
"subtask_index": 2, # References "Lift the apple"
|
||||
"observation.state": [...],
|
||||
"action": [...],
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Annotating Datasets with Subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
We provide a HuggingFace Space for easily annotating any LeRobotDataset with subtasks:
|
||||
|
||||
**[https://huggingface.co/spaces/lerobot/annotate](https://huggingface.co/spaces/lerobot/annotate)**
|
||||
|
||||
After completing your annotation:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Click "Push to Hub" to upload your annotated dataset
|
||||
2. You can also run the annotation space locally by following the instructions at [github.com/huggingface/lerobot-annotate](https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot-annotate)
|
||||
|
||||
## Loading Datasets with Subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
When you load a dataset with subtask annotations, the subtask information is automatically available:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from lerobot.datasets import LeRobotDataset
|
||||
|
||||
# Load a dataset with subtask annotations
|
||||
dataset = LeRobotDataset("jadechoghari/collect-fruit-annotated")
|
||||
|
||||
# Access a sample
|
||||
sample = dataset[100]
|
||||
|
||||
# The sample includes both task and subtask information
|
||||
print(sample["task"]) # "Collect the fruit"
|
||||
print(sample["subtask"]) # "Grasp the apple"
|
||||
print(sample["task_index"]) # tensor(0)
|
||||
print(sample["subtask_index"]) # tensor(2)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Checking for Subtask Support
|
||||
|
||||
You can check if a dataset has subtask annotations:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Check if subtasks are available
|
||||
has_subtasks = (
|
||||
"subtask_index" in dataset.features
|
||||
and dataset.meta.subtasks is not None
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if has_subtasks:
|
||||
print(f"Dataset has {len(dataset.meta.subtasks)} unique subtasks")
|
||||
print("Subtasks:", list(dataset.meta.subtasks.index))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Using Subtasks for Training
|
||||
|
||||
### With the Tokenizer Processor
|
||||
|
||||
The `TokenizerProcessor` automatically handles subtask tokenization for Vision-Language Action (VLA) models:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from lerobot.processor import TokenizerProcessorStep
|
||||
|
||||
# Create a tokenizer processor step
|
||||
tokenizer_processor = TokenizerProcessorStep(
|
||||
tokenizer_name_or_path="google/paligemma-3b-pt-224",
|
||||
padding="max_length",
|
||||
max_length=64,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# The processor will automatically tokenize subtasks if present in the batch
|
||||
# and add them to the observation under:
|
||||
# - "observation.subtask.tokens"
|
||||
# - "observation.subtask.attention_mask"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
When subtasks are available in the batch, the tokenizer processor adds:
|
||||
|
||||
- `observation.subtask.tokens`: Tokenized subtask text
|
||||
- `observation.subtask.attention_mask`: Attention mask for the subtask tokens
|
||||
|
||||
### DataLoader with Subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import torch
|
||||
from lerobot.datasets import LeRobotDataset
|
||||
|
||||
dataset = LeRobotDataset("jadechoghari/collect-fruit-annotated")
|
||||
|
||||
dataloader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(
|
||||
dataset,
|
||||
batch_size=16,
|
||||
shuffle=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
for batch in dataloader:
|
||||
# Access subtask information in the batch
|
||||
subtasks = batch["subtask"] # List of subtask strings
|
||||
subtask_indices = batch["subtask_index"] # Tensor of subtask indices
|
||||
|
||||
# Use for training hierarchical policies or reward models
|
||||
print(f"Batch subtasks: {set(subtasks)}")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Datasets with Subtask Annotations
|
||||
|
||||
Try loading a dataset with subtask annotations:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from lerobot.datasets import LeRobotDataset
|
||||
|
||||
# Example dataset with subtask annotations
|
||||
dataset = LeRobotDataset("jadechoghari/collect-fruit-annotated")
|
||||
|
||||
# Explore the subtasks
|
||||
print("Available subtasks:")
|
||||
for subtask_name in dataset.meta.subtasks.index:
|
||||
print(f" - {subtask_name}")
|
||||
|
||||
# Get subtask distribution
|
||||
subtask_counts = {}
|
||||
for i in range(len(dataset)):
|
||||
sample = dataset[i]
|
||||
subtask = sample["subtask"]
|
||||
subtask_counts[subtask] = subtask_counts.get(subtask, 0) + 1
|
||||
|
||||
print("\nSubtask distribution:")
|
||||
for subtask, count in sorted(subtask_counts.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]):
|
||||
print(f" {subtask}: {count} frames")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Use Cases
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Hierarchical Policy Training
|
||||
|
||||
Train policies that predict both actions and current subtask:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
class HierarchicalPolicy(nn.Module):
|
||||
def __init__(self, num_subtasks):
|
||||
super().__init__()
|
||||
self.action_head = nn.Linear(hidden_dim, action_dim)
|
||||
self.subtask_head = nn.Linear(hidden_dim, num_subtasks)
|
||||
|
||||
def forward(self, observations):
|
||||
features = self.encoder(observations)
|
||||
actions = self.action_head(features)
|
||||
subtask_logits = self.subtask_head(features)
|
||||
return actions, subtask_logits
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Stage-Aware Reward Modeling (SARM)
|
||||
|
||||
Build reward models that understand task progression:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# SARM predicts:
|
||||
# - Stage: Which subtask is being executed (discrete)
|
||||
# - Progress: How far along the subtask (continuous 0-1)
|
||||
|
||||
class SARMRewardModel(nn.Module):
|
||||
def forward(self, observations):
|
||||
features = self.encoder(observations)
|
||||
stage_logits = self.stage_classifier(features)
|
||||
progress = self.progress_regressor(features)
|
||||
return stage_logits, progress
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Progress Visualization
|
||||
|
||||
Monitor robot execution by tracking subtask progression:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def visualize_execution(model, observations):
|
||||
for t, obs in enumerate(observations):
|
||||
action, subtask_logits = model(obs)
|
||||
predicted_subtask = subtask_names[subtask_logits.argmax()]
|
||||
print(f"t={t}: Executing '{predicted_subtask}'")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## API Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### LeRobotDataset Properties
|
||||
|
||||
| Property | Type | Description |
|
||||
| --------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
|
||||
| `meta.subtasks` | `pd.DataFrame \| None` | DataFrame mapping subtask names to indices |
|
||||
| `features["subtask_index"]` | `dict` | Feature spec for subtask_index if present |
|
||||
|
||||
### Sample Keys
|
||||
|
||||
When subtasks are available, each sample includes:
|
||||
|
||||
| Key | Type | Description |
|
||||
| --------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------ |
|
||||
| `subtask_index` | `torch.Tensor` | Integer index of the current subtask |
|
||||
| `subtask` | `str` | Natural language subtask description |
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Resources
|
||||
|
||||
- [SARM Paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.25358) - Stage-Aware Reward Modeling for Long Horizon Robot Manipulation
|
||||
- [LeRobot Annotate Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/lerobot/annotate) - Interactive annotation tool
|
||||
- [LeRobotDataset v3.0](./lerobot-dataset-v3) - Dataset format documentation
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
||||
# Language columns and recipes
|
||||
|
||||
LeRobot stores reusable language annotations directly next to frame data in `data/chunk-*/file-*.parquet`.
|
||||
The two optional columns are:
|
||||
|
||||
- `language_persistent`: a list of rows broadcast across every frame in an episode for state that remains active, such as `subtask`, `plan`, and `memory`.
|
||||
- `language_events`: a list of rows only on the exact frame where an event was emitted, such as `interjection`, `vqa`, and speech tool calls.
|
||||
|
||||
Both columns share the same row shape:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
role: string
|
||||
content: string | null
|
||||
style: string | null
|
||||
timestamp: float64
|
||||
tool_calls: list[Json] | null
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`meta/tasks.parquet` remains the canonical source for the task. The special `${task}` recipe binding always reads that task string and does not depend on language annotations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
The language stack has three layers:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `lerobot.datasets.language` defines the schema, style registry, and `column_for_style`.
|
||||
2. `lerobot.datasets.language_render` resolves rows and renders messages.
|
||||
3. `RenderMessagesStep` turns dataset samples into `messages`, `message_streams`, and `target_message_indices`.
|
||||
|
||||
`LeRobotDataset` stays recipe-agnostic. It passes `language_persistent` and `language_events` through when present, and unannotated datasets keep their existing behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
## Temporal semantics
|
||||
|
||||
Persistent styles are active after emission until replaced:
|
||||
|
||||
- `active_at(t, style=subtask)`
|
||||
- `nth_prev(style=memory, offset=1)`
|
||||
- `nth_next(style=subtask, offset=1)`
|
||||
|
||||
Event styles only exist on their exact timestamp:
|
||||
|
||||
- `emitted_at(t, style=interjection)`
|
||||
- `emitted_at(t, style=vqa, role=user)`
|
||||
- `emitted_at(t, role=assistant, tool_name=say)`
|
||||
|
||||
Exact event matching has no tolerance window, so writers must stamp event rows with frame timestamps from the parquet data.
|
||||
|
||||
## Recipe anatomy
|
||||
|
||||
Recipes are YAML files backed by `TrainingRecipe` and `MessageTurn`.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
messages:
|
||||
- { role: user, content: "${task}", stream: high_level }
|
||||
- { role: assistant, content: "${subtask}", stream: low_level, target: true }
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Rendered samples use HF-style chat messages plus LeRobot sidecars:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
sample["messages"]
|
||||
sample["message_streams"]
|
||||
sample["target_message_indices"]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The renderer does not apply a tokenizer chat template. Policy processors decide how to serialize the messages for their backbone.
|
||||
|
||||
## Blends
|
||||
|
||||
Blend recipes select one weighted sub-recipe deterministically from the sample index.
|
||||
The canonical `recipes/pi05_hirobot.yaml` combines memory updates, interjection responses, high-level subtask prediction, low-level execution, and VQA.
|
||||
|
||||
## Graceful absence
|
||||
|
||||
If both language columns are missing, `None`, or empty, `RenderMessagesStep` is a no-op.
|
||||
If an event-scoped branch is selected on a frame without the required event row, rendering returns `None`, allowing a loader to retry another sample.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user