Files
lerobot/src/lerobot/annotations/steerable_pipeline/prompts/interjections_interjection.txt
T
Pepijn cec8ee0be6 feat: language annotation pipeline (#3471)
Steerable annotation pipeline (lerobot-annotate) that populates the language_persistent and language_events columns introduced in PR 1 (#3467) directly into data/chunk-*/file-*.parquet.

This is PR 2 of the three-PR plan:

PR 1 (Add extensive language support #3467): schema + DSL + rendering, base of this PR
PR 2 (this PR): annotation pipeline writing into PR 1's columns
PR 3: model with language prediction and runtime
A VLM (Qwen-VL family, served on vLLM) watches each episode's video and emits grounded language annotations: subtasks, plans, memory, task rephrasings, interjections + speech, and per-camera VQA. The pipeline is built for production annotation at scale — single-camera grounding, embedded-frame inputs, a describe-then-segment grounding flow, and a deterministic full-episode coverage guarantee — informed by Scale's dense-captioning findings (representation > sampling, rules > reasoning, model capacity is the biggest lever, two-pass systems compound errors)
2026-06-12 15:12:33 +02:00

47 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext

You are generating training data for a Hi Robot-style hierarchical
robot policy. The robot in this demonstration has ALREADY executed
every step shown in the video — we cannot retroactively change the
action stream. To keep training data consistent with the video, the
"interjection" must align with what the robot is *about to do next* in
the demonstration, framed as a natural mid-task user request.
The episode's overall task: "{episode_task}".
The images above show roughly {window_seconds:.1f} seconds straddling a
subtask boundary in the demonstration:
- Subtask the robot just finished: "{prev_subtask}"
- Subtask the robot is about to start: "{next_subtask}"
- Time into episode: {timestamp:.2f}s
Write ONE compact interjection the user would naturally say at this
moment to prompt / confirm / encourage the robot to do "{next_subtask}".
Keep it like a mid-task coaching cue, not a full instruction paragraph.
Also write the robot's compact verbal acknowledgement.
Hard rules:
- The interjection MUST be consistent with the next subtask. The user
cannot ask for something different from what the robot then does in
the video. If you're tempted to say "actually skip X" or "do Y
instead", DO NOT — those would contradict the demonstration.
- The interjection must reference an object, location, or action that
is plausible given the visible scene and the next subtask text.
- One short phrase or sentence each. Conversational, not robotic.
- Prefer direct cues: "{next_subtask}, please."; "Now {next_subtask}."
- Keep robot speech very short: "OK.", "On it.", "Doing that."
Style examples (vary the phrasing — don't reuse these verbatim):
- "Now go ahead and {next_subtask}."
- "Great, can you {next_subtask} next?"
- "{next_subtask}, please."
- "Before you continue, please {next_subtask}."
- "Looking good — {next_subtask} now."
- "Okay, {next_subtask}."
Output strictly valid JSON:
{{
"interjection": "<short cue from the user, asking for the next subtask>",
"speech": "<short robot acknowledgement>"
}}