Files
lerobot/docs/source/libero_plus.mdx
T
Steven Palma 2d8f5f314e feat(env): config to skip the discarded scene rebuild on reset Libero (#4272)
* perf(libero): skip the discarded scene rebuild on reset

LIBERO's OffScreenRenderEnv defaults to hard_reset=True, so every reset() frees
the MjSim, re-serialises the scene with model.get_xml(), recompiles it with
MjSim.from_xml_string(), constructs a fresh offscreen GL context and re-wires
every observable.

When init states are in use, LiberoEnv.reset() immediately calls
set_init_state(), which overwrites the whole sim state -- so all of that work is
discarded. This passes hard_reset=not init_states instead. Without init states
the randomisation reset() performs is the only thing placing the objects, so the
hard reset is kept.

Measured on an RTX 3060 Ti (EGL, robosuite 1.4.0, mujoco 3.2.7, 256x256 x2
cameras), through LiberoEnv.reset(), fresh env per arm:

  suite            hard      soft     saved
  libero_spatial   1697 ms   233 ms   1464 ms
  libero_object    1394 ms   172 ms   1222 ms
  libero_goal      1177 ms   164 ms   1013 ms
  libero_10        1528 ms   207 ms   1321 ms

Equivalence
-----------
Immediately after set_init_state, qpos, qvel, ctrl and act are bit-identical
between the two paths on every suite tested.

After the 10 settle steps that reset() runs, 9 of 41 qpos entries differ:
robot0_joint1..7 (<= 2.4e-5 rad) and gripper0_finger_joint1/2 (<= 2.1e-4 rad).
No object joint differs on any suite. The drift is driven by the gripper
component of the settle action ([0,0,0,0,0,0,-1]); replacing it with zeros keeps
the two paths bit-identical for 12 further steps, and with num_steps_wait=0 there
is no divergence at all.

Wrist-camera pixels can differ by up to ~87/255, because a sub-millimetre finger
displacement crosses rasterisation boundaries at 256x256. The pixel metric badly
overstates the physical difference here; 2.1e-4 rad is 0.012 degrees.

So this is not bit-identical end to end, and reviewers should decide whether
0.012 degrees of gripper drift is acceptable for the benchmark. It does not
change object placement, which is what the fixed init states exist to control.


* refactor(env): config param libero + docs

---------

Co-authored-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <dvdimitrov13@gmail.com>
2026-07-31 16:28:12 +02:00

203 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext

# LIBERO-plus
LIBERO-plus is a **robustness benchmark** for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models built on top of [LIBERO](./libero). It systematically stress-tests policies by applying **seven independent perturbation dimensions** to the original LIBERO task set, exposing failure modes that standard benchmarks miss.
- Paper: [In-depth Robustness Analysis of Vision-Language-Action Models](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13626)
- GitHub: [sylvestf/LIBERO-plus](https://github.com/sylvestf/LIBERO-plus)
- Dataset: [lerobot/libero_plus](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lerobot/libero_plus)
![An overview of the LIBERO-plus benchmark perturbation dimensions](https://github.com/sylvestf/LIBERO-plus/raw/main/static/images/libero-plus.jpg)
## Perturbation dimensions
LIBERO-plus creates ~10 000 task variants by perturbing each original LIBERO task along these axes:
| Dimension | What changes |
| --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| Objects layout | Target position, presence of confounding objects |
| Camera viewpoints | Camera position, orientation, field-of-view |
| Robot initial states | Manipulator start pose |
| Language instructions | LLM-rewritten task description (paraphrase / synonym) |
| Light conditions | Intensity, direction, color, shadow |
| Background textures | Scene surface and object appearance |
| Sensor noise | Photometric distortions and image degradation |
## Available task suites
LIBERO-plus covers the same five suites as LIBERO:
| Suite | CLI name | Tasks | Max steps | Description |
| -------------- | ---------------- | ----- | --------- | -------------------------------------------------- |
| LIBERO-Spatial | `libero_spatial` | 10 | 280 | Tasks requiring reasoning about spatial relations |
| LIBERO-Object | `libero_object` | 10 | 280 | Tasks centered on manipulating different objects |
| LIBERO-Goal | `libero_goal` | 10 | 300 | Goal-conditioned tasks with changing targets |
| LIBERO-90 | `libero_90` | 90 | 400 | Short-horizon tasks from the LIBERO-100 collection |
| LIBERO-Long | `libero_10` | 10 | 520 | Long-horizon tasks from the LIBERO-100 collection |
<Tip warning={true}>
Installing LIBERO-plus **replaces** vanilla LIBERO — it uninstalls `hf-libero`
so that `import libero` resolves to the LIBERO-plus fork. You cannot have both
installed at the same time. To switch back to vanilla LIBERO, uninstall the
fork and reinstall with `pip install -e ".[libero]"`.
</Tip>
## Installation
### System dependencies (Linux only)
```bash
sudo apt install libexpat1 libfontconfig1-dev libmagickwand-dev
```
### Python package
```bash
pip install -e ".[libero]" "robosuite==1.4.1" bddl easydict mujoco wand scikit-image gym
git clone https://github.com/sylvestf/LIBERO-plus.git
cd LIBERO-plus && pip install --no-deps -e .
pip uninstall -y hf-libero # so `import libero` resolves to the fork
```
LIBERO-plus is installed from its GitHub fork rather than a pyproject extra — the fork ships as a namespace package that pip can't handle, so it must be cloned and added to `PYTHONPATH`. See `docker/Dockerfile.benchmark.libero_plus` for the canonical install. MuJoCo is required, so only Linux is supported.
<Tip>
Set the MuJoCo rendering backend before running evaluation:
```bash
export MUJOCO_GL=egl # headless / HPC / cloud
```
</Tip>
### Download LIBERO-plus assets
LIBERO-plus ships its extended asset pack separately. Download `assets.zip` from the [Hugging Face dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Sylvest/LIBERO-plus/tree/main) and extract it into the LIBERO-plus package directory:
```bash
# After installing the package, find where it was installed:
python -c "import libero; print(libero.__file__)"
# Then extract assets.zip into <package_root>/libero/assets/
```
## Evaluation
### Default evaluation (recommended)
Evaluate across the four standard suites (10 episodes per task):
```bash
lerobot-eval \
--policy.path="your-policy-id" \
--env.type=libero_plus \
--env.task=libero_spatial,libero_object,libero_goal,libero_10 \
--eval.batch_size=1 \
--eval.n_episodes=10 \
--env.max_parallel_tasks=1
```
### Single-suite evaluation
Evaluate on one LIBERO-plus suite:
```bash
lerobot-eval \
--policy.path="your-policy-id" \
--env.type=libero_plus \
--env.task=libero_spatial \
--eval.batch_size=1 \
--eval.n_episodes=10
```
- `--env.task` picks the suite (`libero_spatial`, `libero_object`, etc.).
- `--env.task_ids` restricts to specific task indices (`[0]`, `[1,2,3]`, etc.). Omit to run all tasks in the suite.
- `--eval.batch_size` controls how many environments run in parallel.
- `--eval.n_episodes` sets how many episodes to run per task.
### Multi-suite evaluation
Benchmark a policy across multiple suites at once by passing a comma-separated list:
```bash
lerobot-eval \
--policy.path="your-policy-id" \
--env.type=libero_plus \
--env.task=libero_spatial,libero_object \
--eval.batch_size=1 \
--eval.n_episodes=10
```
### Control mode
LIBERO-plus supports two control modes — `relative` (default) and `absolute`. Different VLA checkpoints are trained with different action parameterizations, so make sure the mode matches your policy:
```bash
--env.control_mode=relative # or "absolute"
```
### Reset performance
By default, LeRobot preserves LIBERO's hard-reset behavior. With fixed initial
states enabled, you can opt into soft resets to skip rebuilding the simulator
model and renderer on every episode:
```bash
--env.init_states=true --env.hard_reset=false
```
Soft resets are faster but are not bit-identical to hard resets after the
environment's settling steps, so camera observations and policy results may
differ slightly. Use hard resets when reproducing benchmark results.
### Policy inputs and outputs
**Observations:**
- `observation.state` — 8-dim proprioceptive features (eef position, axis-angle orientation, gripper qpos)
- `observation.images.image` — main camera view (`agentview_image`), HWC uint8
- `observation.images.image2` — wrist camera view (`robot0_eye_in_hand_image`), HWC uint8
**Actions:**
- Continuous control in `Box(-1, 1, shape=(7,))` — 6D end-effector delta + 1D gripper
### Recommended evaluation episodes
For reproducible benchmarking, use **10 episodes per task** across all four standard suites (Spatial, Object, Goal, Long). This gives 400 total episodes and matches the protocol used for published results.
## Training
### Dataset
A LeRobot-format training dataset for LIBERO-plus is available at:
- [lerobot/libero_plus](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lerobot/libero_plus)
### Example training command
```bash
lerobot-train \
--policy.type=smolvla \
--policy.repo_id=${HF_USER}/smolvla_libero_plus \
--policy.load_vlm_weights=true \
--dataset.repo_id=lerobot/libero_plus \
--env.type=libero_plus \
--env.task=libero_spatial \
--output_dir=./outputs/ \
--steps=100000 \
--batch_size=4 \
--eval.batch_size=1 \
--eval.n_episodes=1 \
--env_eval_freq=1000
```
## Relationship to LIBERO
LIBERO-plus is a drop-in extension of LIBERO:
- Same Python gym interface (`LiberoEnv`, `LiberoProcessorStep`)
- Same camera names and observation/action format
- Same task suite names
- Installs under the same `libero` Python package name (different GitHub repo)
To use the original LIBERO benchmark, see [LIBERO](./libero) and use `--env.type=libero`.