Files
lerobot/docs/source/tools.mdx
T
Pepijn beb22afd81 review: dedupe regex, centralize column names, harden collate, more tests
* **#2 — dedupe `_PLACEHOLDER_RE`.** The same regex was compiled in
  `recipe.py` and `language_render.py`. Promote to module-level
  `PLACEHOLDER_RE` in `recipe.py` (its primary owner — declares
  template syntax) and import from `language_render.py`.
* **#3 — centralize language column names.** `io_utils.py` had
  hardcoded `{"language_persistent", "language_events"}` literals at
  two sites. Replace with `LANGUAGE_COLUMNS` import so a future column
  rename can't silently desync.
* **#4 — defensive collate preserved-keys.** `lerobot_collate_fn`
  silently filtered language fields from samples that didn't have
  them, which would hand downstream consumers a preserved list
  shorter than the tensor batch. Now: if any sample carries a key,
  every sample in the batch must carry it; otherwise raise a
  `ValueError` so the upstream rendering bug surfaces at the boundary.
* **#5 — `_scalar` rejects non-singleton lists.** Previously a zero-
  or multi-element list fell through and triggered confusing
  `float([])` errors downstream. Now raises `ValueError` with the
  actual length.
* **#6 — refactor `_extract_complementary_data`.** Replace 11 lines
  of `key = {... if ... else {}}` plus an 11-line splat dict with a
  single `_COMPLEMENTARY_KEYS` tuple iterated once.
* **#7 — document `EXTENDED_STYLES`.** Was an empty `set()` with no
  comment. Add a docstring explaining it's an intentional extension
  point: downstream modules append project-local styles before
  `column_for_style` is called.
* **#9 — `tools.mdx` notes the runtime layer is future work.** The
  page referenced `src/lerobot/tools/`, `registry.py`, and
  `get_tools(meta)` — none exist in this PR. Added a callout at the
  start of "How to add your own tool" plus a note on the
  implementations paragraph.
* **#10 — tests for YAML round-trip, malformed rows, blend
  validation.** `test_recipe.py` grew from 1 case to 12 covering:
  blend-or-messages exclusivity, target-turn requirement, blend
  emptiness, weight presence/positivity, nested-blend rejection,
  `from_dict` with nested blends, `from_yaml` / `load_recipe`
  agreement, top-level non-mapping rejection. Added a malformed-row
  test for `_normalize_rows` that asserts non-dict entries raise
  `TypeError`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-06 19:06:38 +02:00

211 lines
6.0 KiB
Plaintext

# Tools
LeRobot v3.1 supports **tool calls** in policies — assistant messages can
emit structured invocations like `say(text="OK, starting now")` that the
runtime dispatches to a real implementation (TTS, controller, logger, …).
This page covers:
1. Where the tool catalog lives.
2. How the annotation pipeline produces tool-call atoms.
3. How to add your own tool.
## Where tools are declared
Two layers.
**The catalog** — a list of OpenAI-style function schemas — lives at
`meta/info.json["tools"]` on each dataset. Example:
```json
{
"features": { "...": "..." },
"tools": [
{
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "say",
"description": "Speak a short utterance to the user via the TTS executor.",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"text": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The verbatim text to speak."
}
},
"required": ["text"]
}
}
}
]
}
```
Read it via the dataset metadata accessor:
```python
from lerobot.datasets.dataset_metadata import LeRobotDatasetMetadata
meta = LeRobotDatasetMetadata(repo_id="pepijn/super_poulain_final_annotations")
tools = meta.tools # list[dict] — OpenAI tool schemas
```
If the dataset's `info.json` doesn't declare any tools, `meta.tools`
returns `DEFAULT_TOOLS` from `lerobot.datasets.language` — currently a
single-entry list with the canonical `say` schema. So unannotated
datasets and chat-template consumers keep working without any
configuration:
```python
prompt_str = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
sample["messages"],
tools=meta.tools, # works either way
add_generation_prompt=False,
tokenize=False,
)
```
**The implementations** — runnable Python — will live under
`src/lerobot/tools/`, one file per tool. The runtime dispatcher and
the canonical `say` implementation (wrapping Kyutai's pocket-tts) land
in a follow-up PR; this PR ships only the catalog storage and
fallback constant.
## Per-row tool _invocations_
The catalog above describes _what can be called_. The actual _call_ — the
function name plus the argument values — is stored per-row, on the
assistant atoms in `language_events`:
```python
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": null,
"style": null,
"timestamp": 12.4,
"camera": null,
"tool_calls": [
{ "type": "function",
"function": { "name": "say", "arguments": { "text": "On it." } } }
]
}
```
Recipes splice these into rendered messages via `tool_calls_from`:
```yaml
user_interjection_response:
bindings:
speech: "emitted_at(t, role=assistant, tool_name=say)"
messages:
- { role: user, content: "${task}", stream: high_level }
- {
role: assistant,
content: "${current_plan}",
stream: high_level,
target: true,
tool_calls_from: speech,
}
```
The model's training target is one assistant turn that carries both the
plan text _and_ the `say` tool call. At inference, the runtime parses
the generated text back into structured `tool_calls` and dispatches to
the matching implementation.
## How to add your own tool
> **Note:** Steps 2 and 3 below describe the runtime layer
> (`src/lerobot/tools/`, the `Tool` protocol, `TOOL_REGISTRY`,
> `get_tools(meta)`) which lands in a follow-up PR. Today (this PR
> only), Step 1 is enough to make the tool visible to the chat
> template via `meta.tools` so the model can learn to _generate_ the
> call. Executing the call at inference is what the follow-up PR
> wires up.
Three steps. Concrete example: a `record_observation` tool the policy
can call to capture an extra observation outside the regular control
loop.
### Step 1 — declare the schema
Add an entry under `meta/info.json["tools"]`. Either edit the file
directly on disk _before_ running the annotation pipeline (it'll be
preserved) or hand it to `lerobot-annotate` via a config flag.
```json
{
"tools": [
{ "type": "function", "function": { "name": "say", "...": "..." } },
{
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "record_observation",
"description": "Capture a high-resolution still image for the user.",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Short label for the saved image."
}
},
"required": ["label"]
}
}
}
]
}
```
The schema follows OpenAI's function-calling convention exactly, so the
chat template can render it natively.
### Step 2 — implement the call
Create `src/lerobot/tools/record_observation.py`:
```python
from .base import Tool
from typing import Any
RECORD_OBSERVATION_SCHEMA: dict[str, Any] = { "...": "..." } # mirrors the JSON above
class RecordObservationTool:
name = "record_observation"
schema = RECORD_OBSERVATION_SCHEMA
def __init__(self, schema: dict | None = None, output_dir: str = "."):
self.output_dir = output_dir
def call(self, arguments: dict) -> str:
label = arguments["label"]
# ... save the latest camera frame to <output_dir>/<label>.png ...
return f"saved {label}.png"
```
One file per tool keeps dependencies isolated — `record_observation`
might pull `pillow`, while `say` pulls `pocket-tts`. Users installing
only the tools they need avoid heavy transitive deps.
### Step 3 — register it
Add to `src/lerobot/tools/registry.py`:
```python
from .record_observation import RecordObservationTool
TOOL_REGISTRY["record_observation"] = RecordObservationTool
```
That's it. At runtime `get_tools(meta)` looks up each schema in
`meta.tools`, instantiates the matching registered class, and returns
a name → instance dict the dispatcher can route into.
If you want to use a tool _without_ writing an implementation (e.g. for
training-time chat-template formatting only), step 1 alone is enough —
the model still learns to _generate_ the call. Steps 2 and 3 are only
needed to actually _execute_ it at inference.