feat(annotate): improve VLM subtask annotation (legible contact sheets, seeded relabeling, self-hosted vLLM recipe) (#3896)

* feat(annotate): WGO-tuned subtask prompt (atomic completed-events + duration prior)

Rework the plan-module subtask segmentation prompt toward the WGO-Bench
atomic annotation protocol: segment by completed world-state changes
(grasp/place/open/close/pour/insert), fold approach+retreat into their
event, keep separate events separate, and add a 2-10s duration prior.
Drops the pi0.7 "fewer larger composites preferred" bias that drove
under-segmentation on the benchmark. Output JSON shape unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* feat(annotate): seeded-relabeling second pass for subtasks

Add an opt-in relabel pass (plan.subtask_seeded_relabel) that, after
segmentation, re-labels each span using previous/current/next segment
contact sheets and the seed label as a strong prior, minimally correcting
it. Mirrors macrodata's best end-to-end labeling step. Boundaries are
untouched; one extra VLM call per span. Off by default.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* feat(annotate): robust OpenAI-compat client for hosted VLMs

Guard against a choice with no message (safety filter or a thinking model
that spends its whole budget before emitting content) so one empty reply
no longer crashes the whole annotation run; treat it as an empty response
and let the existing JSON-retry path handle it.

Add an optional `reasoning_effort` knob on VlmConfig, forwarded to the
server when set, to cap a thinking model's reasoning (needed for Gemini
via its OpenAI-compatible endpoint).

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* feat(annotate): legible tile-scaled timestamp on contact sheets

The burned-in timestamp used the ~10px bitmap default font, which blurs
once the model downsamples a full contact sheet into 768px tiles, so the
VLM can no longer read the exact source time a boundary depends on. Scale
the timestamp to the tile height (with a graceful fallback on older
Pillow) so the visual time cue stays readable at sheet resolution.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* feat(annotate): lean GEPA-aligned subtask segmentation prompt

Replace the verbose, label-heavy segmentation prompt with a lean
adaptation of the blog's GEPA-found completed_events_duration_prior
recipe: focus on completed manipulation events, explicit no-split /
no-merge rules, a 2-10s duration prior, and an instruction to prioritize
temporally correct boundaries over label wording. The previous prompt
over-weighted label guidance, which traded away boundary precision.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* revert: restore original subtask segmentation prompt

The lean GEPA-aligned paraphrase (dd4b0110d) regressed Gemini on the
30-ep subset: Seg F1 0.259 -> 0.189 and E2E 0.184 -> 0.135, driven by
worse under-segmentation (224 -> 188 preds). The blog's 0.306 came from
the actual GEPA-search artifact, which a hand paraphrase does not
reproduce. Restore the original prompt, which remains our best config.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* feat(annotate): env-var override for prompt templates

Allow LEROBOT_PROMPT_OVERRIDE_<name> to supersede the packaged prompt
file at load time. Enables prompt search (GEPA) to inject candidate
segmentation prompts into a remote annotate job via an env secret,
without committing a branch per candidate.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* docs(annotate): genericize hosted-VLM comments (no model name)

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* docs(annotate): document seeded-relabel and reasoning_effort flags

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* test(annotate): update subtask-prompt marker to match WGO-tuned prompt

The three plan-module tests keyed the canned VLM responder on the
literal 'atomic subtasks', which the WGO-tuned segmentation prompt no
longer contains (it now segments 'COMPLETED manipulation events'). Point
the fixture markers at the current wording so the subtask call is matched
again.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
Pepijn
2026-07-15 11:38:49 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent e40b58a8df
commit 279c6c7af3
9 changed files with 214 additions and 126 deletions
+30 -21
View File
@@ -81,6 +81,12 @@ merged. Both prompts also carry a causal **event-boundary** definition (a
new event starts when an object becomes held / is released / reaches a new
location / a lid changes state / contents move) to sharpen where cuts land.
Optionally, a third **seeded-relabel** pass (`--plan.subtask_seeded_relabel`)
revisits each span with its previous/current/next segment contact sheets and
minimally corrects the label, using the first label as a prior — it keeps the
boundaries fixed and only sharpens wording, at the cost of one extra call per
subtask.
The resulting spans are then stitched into a gap-free, full-episode
cover, so **every frame has exactly one active subtask**. See
[`run_hf_job.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot/blob/main/examples/annotations/run_hf_job.py)
@@ -157,30 +163,33 @@ Every module is on by default and can be toggled independently (set to
### The VLM (`--vlm.*`)
| Flag | Default | What it does |
| -------------------------- | ------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `--vlm.model_id` | `Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B` | The model to serve and prompt. |
| `--vlm.camera_key` | first `images.*` | Which camera every prompt is grounded on. |
| `--vlm.serve_command` | auto | The exact `vllm serve …` command (set TP size, GPU memory, `--max-model-len` here). |
| `--vlm.parallel_servers` | `1` | Independent servers for round-robin routing (one per GPU). |
| `--vlm.num_gpus` | `0` | GPUs per server (`0` = one each). |
| `--vlm.client_concurrency` | `16` | In-flight requests across all servers. |
| `--vlm.max_new_tokens` | `512` | Generation cap per call. |
| `--vlm.temperature` | `0.2` | Sampling temperature. |
| Flag | Default | What it does |
| -------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| `--vlm.model_id` | `Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B` | The model to serve and prompt. |
| `--vlm.camera_key` | first `images.*` | Which camera every prompt is grounded on. |
| `--vlm.serve_command` | auto | The exact `vllm serve …` command (set TP size, GPU memory, `--max-model-len` here). |
| `--vlm.parallel_servers` | `1` | Independent servers for round-robin routing (one per GPU). |
| `--vlm.num_gpus` | `0` | GPUs per server (`0` = one each). |
| `--vlm.client_concurrency` | `16` | In-flight requests across all servers. |
| `--vlm.max_new_tokens` | `512` | Generation cap per call. |
| `--vlm.temperature` | `0.2` | Sampling temperature. |
| `--vlm.reasoning_effort` | `null` | Thinking-budget hint (`low`/`medium`/`high`) forwarded to OpenAI-compatible servers. |
### Subtasks / plan / memory (`--plan.*`)
| Flag | Default | What it does |
| ------------------------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `--plan.frames_per_second` | `2.0` | Frame sampling rate for the contact sheets (`2.0` = one frame every 0.5s). |
| `--plan.max_frames_per_prompt` | `60` | Frame budget per VLM call. Episodes whose sampling exceeds this are auto-windowed at the same density, then stitched. |
| `--plan.contact_sheet_columns` | `5` | Columns per contact-sheet grid (`contact_sheet_frames_per_sheet` tiles, time row-major). |
| `--plan.plan_max_steps` | `8` | Upper bound on subtasks per episode. |
| `--plan.subtask_describe_first` | `true` | Run the describe→segment grounding pass (best subtask quality; +1 call/episode). |
| `--plan.emit_plan` | `true` | Emit the numbered `plan` rows (`false` = subtasks + memory only). |
| `--plan.emit_memory` | `true` | Emit the `memory` rows (`false` = subtasks + plan only); symmetric to `emit_plan`. |
| `--plan.n_task_rephrasings` | `10` | How many `task_aug` rephrasings to emit (`0` disables). |
| `--plan.derive_task_from_video` | `if_short` | Use the dataset task as-is (`off`), only when it's missing/short (`if_short`), or always re-derive from video (`always`). |
| Flag | Default | What it does |
| ------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `--plan.frames_per_second` | `2.0` | Frame sampling rate for the contact sheets (`2.0` = one frame every 0.5s). |
| `--plan.max_frames_per_prompt` | `60` | Frame budget per VLM call. Episodes whose sampling exceeds this are auto-windowed at the same density, then stitched. |
| `--plan.contact_sheet_columns` | `5` | Columns per contact-sheet grid (`contact_sheet_frames_per_sheet` tiles, time row-major). |
| `--plan.plan_max_steps` | `8` | Upper bound on subtasks per episode. |
| `--plan.subtask_describe_first` | `true` | Run the describe→segment grounding pass (best subtask quality; +1 call/episode). |
| `--plan.subtask_seeded_relabel` | `false` | Second pass: re-label each subtask from its prev/current/next contact sheets, seeded with the first label (+1 call/subtask). |
| `--plan.subtask_relabel_frames` | `5` | Frames sampled uniformly per segment sheet in the relabel pass (only used when `subtask_seeded_relabel=true`). |
| `--plan.emit_plan` | `true` | Emit the numbered `plan` rows (`false` = subtasks + memory only). |
| `--plan.emit_memory` | `true` | Emit the `memory` rows (`false` = subtasks + plan only); symmetric to `emit_plan`. |
| `--plan.n_task_rephrasings` | `10` | How many `task_aug` rephrasings to emit (`0` disables). |
| `--plan.derive_task_from_video` | `if_short` | Use the dataset task as-is (`off`), only when it's missing/short (`if_short`), or always re-derive from video (`always`). |
### Interjections + VQA
@@ -65,6 +65,14 @@ class PlanConfig:
# invented from the task text (+1 VLM call/episode).
subtask_describe_first: bool = True
# Seeded relabeling: after segmentation, re-label each span with a focused
# pass that sees the previous / current / next segment contact sheets and
# minimally corrects the seed label (macrodata's best end-to-end labeling
# step). Costs +1 VLM call per subtask; off by default.
subtask_seeded_relabel: bool = False
# Frames sampled uniformly per segment sheet in the relabel pass.
subtask_relabel_frames: int = 5
# Emit ``style="plan"`` rows at each boundary; False = subtasks + memory only.
emit_plan: bool = True
@@ -160,6 +168,11 @@ class VlmConfig:
# Forwarded as extra_body.chat_template_kwargs (e.g. {"enable_thinking": false}).
chat_template_kwargs: dict[str, Any] | None = None
# OpenAI-style thinking budget hint ("low"/"medium"/"high"); forwarded to
# the server when set. Used to cap a thinking model's reasoning so it
# leaves tokens for the actual JSON answer on OpenAI-compatible endpoints.
reasoning_effort: str | None = None
@dataclass
class ExecutorConfig:
@@ -413,7 +413,16 @@ def _draw_timestamp_badge(image: PIL.Image.Image, timestamp: float) -> PIL.Image
result = image.copy()
draw = ImageDraw.Draw(result)
font = ImageFont.load_default()
# Scale the timestamp to the tile so it stays legible after the model
# downsamples the full sheet into 768px tiles — a tiny bitmap font blurs
# at contact-sheet resolution and the VLM can no longer read the exact
# source time, which is what the boundary score depends on. ``size=`` is
# supported by Pillow's bitmap default since 10.1; fall back otherwise.
badge_px = max(14, round(image.height * 0.12))
try:
font = ImageFont.load_default(size=badge_px)
except TypeError:
font = ImageFont.load_default()
label = f"{timestamp:06.2f}s"
left, top, right, bottom = draw.textbbox((0, 0), label, font=font)
text_w, text_h = right - left, bottom - top
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ class PlanSubtasksMemoryModule:
rows.extend(self._task_aug_rows([effective_task, *variants], t0))
subtask_spans = self._generate_subtasks(record, task=effective_task)
if self.config.subtask_seeded_relabel and subtask_spans:
subtask_spans = self._seeded_relabel(record, subtask_spans, effective_task)
# subtask rows
for span in subtask_spans:
@@ -509,6 +511,51 @@ class PlanSubtasksMemoryModule:
return cleaned
def _seeded_relabel(
self, record: EpisodeRecord, spans: list[dict[str, Any]], task: str
) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
"""Re-label each span using prev/current/next segment contact sheets.
Boundaries are kept fixed; only ``text`` is refined. The original
("seed") label is passed as a strong prior so the model verifies and
minimally corrects it rather than re-describing from scratch — the
macrodata seeded-relabeling step. One VLM call per span.
"""
n = len(spans)
out: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
for i, span in enumerate(spans):
content: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
if i > 0:
content += self._segment_sheet(record, spans[i - 1])
content += self._segment_sheet(record, span)
if i < n - 1:
content += self._segment_sheet(record, spans[i + 1])
prompt = load_prompt("plan_subtask_relabel").format(
episode_task=task,
seed_label=span["text"],
segment_index=i + 1,
segment_count=n,
start=float(span["start"]),
end=float(span["end"]),
)
content.append({"type": "text", "text": prompt})
label = self._vlm_field([{"role": "user", "content": content}], "label")
text = label.strip() if isinstance(label, str) and label.strip() else span["text"]
out.append({**span, "text": text})
return out
def _segment_sheet(self, record: EpisodeRecord, span: dict[str, Any]) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
"""Contact-sheet block(s) for one span: up to N frames sampled uniformly."""
s, e = float(span["start"]), float(span["end"])
n = max(1, int(self.config.subtask_relabel_frames))
if e <= s or n == 1:
timestamps = [s]
else:
step = (e - s) / (n - 1)
timestamps = [s + i * step for i in range(n)]
frames = self.frame_provider.frames_at(record, timestamps)
return self._contact_sheet_blocks(frames, timestamps[: len(frames)])
def _generate_subtasks_windowed(
self, record: EpisodeRecord, task: str, window_s: float
) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
@@ -22,12 +22,23 @@ plain editors and roundtrip cleanly through ``ruff format``.
from __future__ import annotations
import os
from pathlib import Path
_DIR = Path(__file__).parent
def load(name: str) -> str:
"""Read prompt template ``name.txt`` from the ``prompts/`` directory."""
"""Read prompt template ``name.txt`` from the ``prompts/`` directory.
A ``LEROBOT_PROMPT_OVERRIDE_<name>`` environment variable, when set to a
non-empty value, takes precedence over the packaged file. This lets prompt
search (e.g. GEPA) inject candidate templates into a remote job without
rebuilding the package; the override must keep the same ``{placeholder}``
fields the call site formats in.
"""
override = os.environ.get(f"LEROBOT_PROMPT_OVERRIDE_{name}")
if override and override.strip():
return override
path = _DIR / f"{name}.txt"
return path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
Annotate one fixed segment from a longer robot demonstration.
Return only JSON:
{{"label": "<short descriptive subtask label>"}}
You are shown up to three timestamped contact sheets, in order:
- The FIRST sheet is the PREVIOUS segment (context only); it may be absent.
- The SECOND sheet is the CURRENT target segment.
- The THIRD sheet is the NEXT segment (context only); it may be absent.
Each tile has its timestamp (seconds, absolute video time) burned into its
top-left corner.
Episode instruction: "{episode_task}"
Target segment: {segment_index} of {segment_count}
Target time: {start:.2f}s to {end:.2f}s
Original predicted label for this exact segment: "{seed_label}"
Rules:
- Label ONLY the current target segment (the second sheet). Use the
previous/next sheets only to disambiguate what changed.
- Treat the original predicted label as a STRONG PRIOR, not ground truth:
verify it against the current segment and correct it minimally.
- If it already names the right action and main object, keep it; only fix
grammar or add a clearly visible essential detail.
- If it is vague but directionally correct, make it more specific.
- If it describes the previous/next segment, the wrong action, wrong
object, wrong destination, or a wrong state change, replace it.
- Do not describe the previous or next segment, and do not split, merge,
or move the fixed segment.
- Do not introduce an action that is not clearly visible in the current
target segment.
- Use one concise imperative phrase. Name the manipulated object and the
action / state change. Include source, destination, side, direction,
final placement, or opened/closed state when visible and central.
- Do not mention timestamps, frame numbers, uncertainty, or intent.
@@ -1,112 +1,68 @@
You are labeling a teleoperated robot demonstration.
You are annotating a teleoperated robot demonstration shown as
timestamped contact sheets (each tile has its time in seconds burned
into the top-left corner). The operator's goal was: "{episode_task}"
The user originally asked: "{episode_task}"
{observation_block}Reconstruct the sequence of COMPLETED manipulation events the robot
performs, in chronological order. Output one segment per event with a
[start, end] time in seconds and a short action label.
You are shown the entire demonstration as a single video. Watch the
whole clip, then segment it into a list of consecutive atomic subtasks
the robot performs.
GROUNDING — read first, it overrides everything below:
- Label ONLY events you can SEE in the frames. The instruction is the
goal; the VIDEO is the ground truth for what actually happened.
- Do NOT invent, anticipate, or pad steps that are not shown.
{observation_block}GROUNDING — read this first, it overrides everything below:
- Label ONLY what the robot actually does in the video. Every subtask
you emit must correspond to motion you can SEE in specific frames.
- Do NOT invent, anticipate, or pad. If the robot only does one thing
(e.g. it just navigates to a location and the clip ends), emit
EXACTLY ONE subtask. Many demonstrations are a single atomic skill.
- ``max_steps`` below is a hard CEILING, not a target. Emitting fewer
subtasks than the ceiling is not just allowed, it is expected for
short / atomic demonstrations. One correct subtask is far better
than several invented ones.
- If the video does not clearly show the action implied by the task,
describe what you actually see — do NOT fabricate the task's steps
from the instruction text. The instruction tells you the goal; the
VIDEO is the ground truth for what happened.
Granularity — segment by completed events, not by motion:
- Start a NEW segment whenever the world state changes: an object is
grasped, lifted, transported, placed, or released; a held object
changes; a drawer/door/lid/container opens or closes; contents move
between containers (poured); a tool starts or stops acting on a
surface. Watch the gripper open/close transitions — they usually mark
boundaries.
- Do NOT split approach, reach, grasp adjustment, small repositioning,
hesitation, or retreat into their own segments. Fold each into the
event it belongs to (the approach is part of the pick; the retreat is
part of the place).
- Do NOT merge separate completed events. Each distinct pick, place,
open, close, pour, push, wipe, or insert is its own segment, even when
they repeat on different objects or locations.
- Most segments last 2-10 seconds. Shorter segments are okay ONLY for
fast pick / place / open / close / release events. Never emit a
segment shorter than {min_subtask_seconds} seconds; merge a too-short
candidate into its neighbour instead.
- Skip idle time, pure camera motion, and tiny hand jitter.
Authoring rules — Hi Robot atom granularity, pi0.7-style short prompts:
Labels — short imperative phrases:
- One concise command naming the action and the manipulated object, e.g.
"pick up the red cup", "put the cup on the shelf", "open the top
drawer", "pour water into the glass", "insert the plug into the
socket".
- Include source, destination, side, direction, or the final
open/closed state when it is visible and central to the event.
- Prefer these verbs (extend only when none fits): pick up, put, place,
push, pull, turn, press, open, close, pour, insert, wipe, stack.
Disambiguate by what you SEE:
* STACK vs PUT: object placed ON TOP OF another object -> "stack".
* INSERT vs PUT: object pushed INTO a fitted slot/hole/socket -> "insert".
* PICK UP vs PUT (direction): gripper CLOSES and object moves WITH
the hand -> "pick up"; gripper OPENS and object stays -> "put".
* POUR vs PUT: source is tilted and contents flow -> "pour".
- Use the exact object nouns implied by the task; stay consistent across
the episode (don't switch "cube" to "block").
- Write imperative commands, never third person ("the robot ..."), and
drop articles/adverbs.
- Each subtask = one COMPOSITE atomic skill the low-level policy can
execute end-to-end. A "skill" bundles its own approach motion with
its terminal action — do NOT split the approach off as its own
subtask. The whole-arm policy already learns to reach as part of
every manipulation primitive.
- Write each subtask as an IMPERATIVE COMMAND, starting with one of
these verbs (extend only when none fits):
pick up <obj> — approach + grasp + lift in one subtask
put <obj> on/in <loc> — transport + release in one subtask
place <obj> on/in <loc> — synonym of "put"; pick one and stay consistent
push <obj> — contact + linear shove
pull <obj> — contact + linear retract
turn <knob/dial/handle> — rotary actuation
press <button> — single-press contact
open <drawer/door/lid> — full open motion
close <drawer/door/lid> — full close motion
pour <src> into <dst> — tilt + flow
insert <obj> into <slot>— alignment + push-fit
go to <loc> — ONLY when no grasp / actuation follows
(e.g. a pure relocation between phases).
If the next subtask grasps something at
that location, drop "go to ..." and just
write "pick up ..." instead.
- Forbidden ultra-fine splits — the VLM is NOT allowed to emit these
as standalone subtasks; fold them into the parent composite:
"move to X" → fold into "pick up X" (or whatever follows)
"reach for X" → fold into "pick up X"
"grasp X" → fold into "pick up X"
"lift X" → fold into "pick up X" (or "put X on Y" if it's
the transport phase of a place)
"release X" → fold into "put X on Y" (or "place X in Y")
- Keep it SHORT — a verb phrase, not a sentence. Drop articles
("the", "a") and adverbs ("carefully", "slowly"). Add a "how"
detail (which hand, which grasp point) ONLY when it is needed to
disambiguate. Every subtask must begin with one of the verbs
above (no leading nouns, no "then", no "first").
- NEVER use third person. Never write "the robot", "the arm", "the
gripper moves", "it picks up" — the robot is implied. Command it,
do not describe it.
- Use the exact object nouns from the task above. If the task says
"cube", every subtask says "cube" — never switch to "block". If it
says "box", never switch to "bin"/"container". Keep vocabulary
consistent across the whole episode.
- Good: "pick up blue cube", "put blue cube in box", "open drawer",
"turn red knob", "press start button", "go to sink".
- Bad: "move to blue cube" (approach as its own subtask — forbidden,
must be folded into "pick up blue cube"); "the robot arm moves
towards the blue cube" (third person, too long); "carefully pick
up the cube" (adverb, article); "release the yellow block"
("block" when the task said "cube", and "release" must be folded
into a "put"/"place" subtask).
- Subtasks are non-overlapping and cover the full episode in order.
Choose the cut points yourself based on what you see in the video
(gripper open/close events, contact, regrasps, transitions).
- Each subtask spans at least {min_subtask_seconds} seconds. If a
candidate span would be shorter, merge it into its neighbour
rather than emitting it.
- Do not exceed {max_steps} subtasks total. Fewer, larger composites
are preferred over many micro-steps.
- Every subtask's [start_time, end_time] must lie within
[0.0, {episode_duration}] seconds.
SPECIAL CASES — verb disambiguation (each rule is narrowly visual and
fires ONLY on the spatial situation it names; it must not change how you
label any other situation):
- STACK vs PUT: if an object is placed ON TOP OF another specific object
(not on a flat table / shelf / counter), use "stack ... on ...", not
"put". "stack blue book on green book", NOT "put blue book on table".
- INSERT vs PUT: if an object goes INTO a fitted slot / hole / socket /
receptacle (push-fit), use "insert ... into ...", not "put".
- RETRIEVE/PICK-UP vs PUT (direction): watch the gripper. If it CLOSES
on the object and the object moves WITH the hand, it is "pick up" /
"retrieve" (object leaves its location). If the gripper OPENS and the
object stays where the hand left it, it is "put" / "place" (object
arrives at a location). Decide by which way the object moves, not by
where the hand ends up.
- POUR vs PUT: only use "pour" when the source is tilted and contents
flow out; moving a full container without tilting is "put"/"place".
Timing:
- Use the burned-in timestamps to set start and end. Boundaries should
land on or near a printed time, and every [start, end] must lie within
[0.0, {episode_duration}] seconds, be non-overlapping, and cover the
episode in order.
- Emit at most {max_steps} segments.
Output strictly valid JSON of shape:
{{
"subtasks": [
{{"text": "<short imperative verb phrase>", "start": <float>, "end": <float>}},
{{"text": "<short imperative action label>", "start": <float>, "end": <float>}},
...
]
}}
@@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ def _make_openai_client(config: VlmConfig) -> VlmClient:
"max_tokens": max_tok,
"temperature": temp,
}
if config.reasoning_effort:
kwargs["reasoning_effort"] = config.reasoning_effort
extra_body: dict[str, Any] = {}
if send_mm_kwargs and mm_kwargs:
extra_body["mm_processor_kwargs"] = {**mm_kwargs, "do_sample_frames": True}
@@ -296,7 +298,13 @@ def _make_openai_client(config: VlmConfig) -> VlmClient:
chosen = clients[rr_counter["i"] % len(clients)]
rr_counter["i"] += 1
response = chosen.chat.completions.create(**kwargs)
return response.choices[0].message.content or ""
# Some OpenAI-compatible servers can return a choice with no message
# (safety filter, or a "thinking" model that spends the whole budget
# before emitting content). Treat that as an empty reply so the
# JSON-retry path handles it instead of crashing the run.
choice = response.choices[0] if response.choices else None
message = choice.message if choice is not None else None
return (message.content if message is not None else None) or ""
def _gen(batch: Sequence[Sequence[dict[str, Any]]], max_tok: int, temp: float) -> list[str]:
if len(batch) <= 1 or config.client_concurrency <= 1:
+3 -3
View File
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ def _spy_responder(captured: list[list[dict[str, Any]]], reply: Any):
def test_module1_plan_memory_subtask_smoke(fixture_dataset_root: Path, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
vlm = make_canned_responder(
{
"atomic subtasks": {
"COMPLETED manipulation events": {
"subtasks": [
{"text": "grasp the handle of the sponge", "start": 0.0, "end": 0.4},
{"text": "wipe the counter from left to right", "start": 0.4, "end": 0.8},
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ def test_module1_emit_memory_false_skips_memory_keeps_subtasks_and_plan(
leaving subtask + plan generation intact symmetric to ``emit_plan``."""
vlm = make_canned_responder(
{
"atomic subtasks": {
"COMPLETED manipulation events": {
"subtasks": [
{"text": "grasp the handle of the sponge", "start": 0.0, "end": 0.4},
{"text": "wipe the counter from left to right", "start": 0.4, "end": 0.8},
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ def test_module1_attaches_contact_sheets_to_subtask_prompt(
return block.get("text", "")
return ""
subtask_calls = [m for m in captured if "atomic subtasks" in _prompt_text(m)]
subtask_calls = [m for m in captured if "COMPLETED manipulation events" in _prompt_text(m)]
assert len(subtask_calls) == 1, "expected exactly one subtask-prompt VLM call"
content = subtask_calls[0][0]["content"]
video_blocks = [b for b in content if isinstance(b, dict) and b.get("type") == "video"]