mirror of
https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot.git
synced 2026-07-24 18:26:11 +00:00
a0eb860d1e4d566157dd0eba11b5c86f9ea7d07a
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
9c82c39c7b |
feat(annotate): run lerobot-annotate on HF Jobs via --job.target (#4095)
* feat(annotate): run lerobot-annotate on HF Jobs via --job.target Annotation needed a hand-edited launcher script (examples/annotations/run_hf_job.py) to reach a GPU: users copied it, rewrote the embedded CMD string for their dataset, and ran it with `python`. Fold that into the CLI instead, mirroring `lerobot-train`: `lerobot-annotate --job.target=h200` submits the exact command you'd run locally. - AnnotationJobConfig extends JobConfig with the annotation runtime's defaults (vllm/vllm-openai image, 2h cap) plus --job.lerobot_ref, so an unmerged branch can be exercised remotely without editing a script. - lerobot.jobs.annotate builds the pod command by replaying the user's own CLI flags (minus --job.*/--root, with --repo_id re-emitted from the config) after a setup prelude that installs lerobot on top of the vLLM image. Job monitoring, log tailing and Ctrl-C-detaches reuse the training submitter's plumbing. - Remote runs require --repo_id; a local-only dataset is pushed privately first. The generated pod command is byte-for-byte the script's old CMD. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(annotate): reject client-side config files on remote runs draccus exposes `--config_path` plus a `--<field>` config-file arg for every nested dataclass (`--vlm`, `--plan`, `--job`, ...). All name files on the client's disk, so forwarding them to the pod silently dropped whatever settings they carried. Reject them up front instead. Bare `--job` also slipped past the `--job.` prefix filter, so a `--job=cfg.yaml` holding `target: h200` would have reached the pod and had the job submit a job of its own, recursively. It is dropped from the forwarded args as well. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * refactor(jobs): share the submit-and-follow loop between both submitters `submit_annotate_to_hf` reused the leaf helpers (`_poll_until_done`, `_tail_logs`, `_pod_forwarded_args`) but duplicated the orchestration around them: ~40 of the 50 lines that spawn the poll/log threads, install the Ctrl-C-detaches handler and raise on a non-COMPLETED stage were identical in both files. Extract that into `follow_job(job_id, *, detach, success_marker=None) -> bool`, returning True when the job finished and False when we stopped watching without a verdict (detach or Ctrl-C). Training keeps its model-pushed marker by passing it in; annotation has no equivalent line (the CLI keeps working after the upload log to write the card and tag) so its completion stays stage-based. Kept in hf.py rather than a new module so every existing monkeypatch target in test_hf.py still resolves. Behaviour change: a training run whose job reaches COMPLETED without the marker matching now prints its completion line instead of returning silently. The marker was already documented as an optimisation with a stage-based fallback; the fallback just never reported success. Tests: adds annotate coverage for the non-detach path (completion and failure) — previously only ever exercised with detach=true — plus a detach short-circuit test. Both new annotate tests verified to fail under a mutation that stubs out follow_job. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
279c6c7af3 |
feat(annotate): improve VLM subtask annotation (legible contact sheets, seeded relabeling, self-hosted vLLM recipe) (#3896)
* feat(annotate): WGO-tuned subtask prompt (atomic completed-events + duration prior)
Rework the plan-module subtask segmentation prompt toward the WGO-Bench
atomic annotation protocol: segment by completed world-state changes
(grasp/place/open/close/pour/insert), fold approach+retreat into their
event, keep separate events separate, and add a 2-10s duration prior.
Drops the pi0.7 "fewer larger composites preferred" bias that drove
under-segmentation on the benchmark. Output JSON shape unchanged.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* feat(annotate): seeded-relabeling second pass for subtasks
Add an opt-in relabel pass (plan.subtask_seeded_relabel) that, after
segmentation, re-labels each span using previous/current/next segment
contact sheets and the seed label as a strong prior, minimally correcting
it. Mirrors macrodata's best end-to-end labeling step. Boundaries are
untouched; one extra VLM call per span. Off by default.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* feat(annotate): robust OpenAI-compat client for hosted VLMs
Guard against a choice with no message (safety filter or a thinking model
that spends its whole budget before emitting content) so one empty reply
no longer crashes the whole annotation run; treat it as an empty response
and let the existing JSON-retry path handle it.
Add an optional `reasoning_effort` knob on VlmConfig, forwarded to the
server when set, to cap a thinking model's reasoning (needed for Gemini
via its OpenAI-compatible endpoint).
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* feat(annotate): legible tile-scaled timestamp on contact sheets
The burned-in timestamp used the ~10px bitmap default font, which blurs
once the model downsamples a full contact sheet into 768px tiles, so the
VLM can no longer read the exact source time a boundary depends on. Scale
the timestamp to the tile height (with a graceful fallback on older
Pillow) so the visual time cue stays readable at sheet resolution.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* feat(annotate): lean GEPA-aligned subtask segmentation prompt
Replace the verbose, label-heavy segmentation prompt with a lean
adaptation of the blog's GEPA-found completed_events_duration_prior
recipe: focus on completed manipulation events, explicit no-split /
no-merge rules, a 2-10s duration prior, and an instruction to prioritize
temporally correct boundaries over label wording. The previous prompt
over-weighted label guidance, which traded away boundary precision.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* revert: restore original subtask segmentation prompt
The lean GEPA-aligned paraphrase (
|
||
|
|
cec8ee0be6 |
feat: language annotation pipeline (#3471)
Steerable annotation pipeline (lerobot-annotate) that populates the language_persistent and language_events columns introduced in PR 1 (#3467) directly into data/chunk-*/file-*.parquet. This is PR 2 of the three-PR plan: PR 1 (Add extensive language support #3467): schema + DSL + rendering, base of this PR PR 2 (this PR): annotation pipeline writing into PR 1's columns PR 3: model with language prediction and runtime A VLM (Qwen-VL family, served on vLLM) watches each episode's video and emits grounded language annotations: subtasks, plans, memory, task rephrasings, interjections + speech, and per-camera VQA. The pipeline is built for production annotation at scale — single-camera grounding, embedded-frame inputs, a describe-then-segment grounding flow, and a deterministic full-episode coverage guarantee — informed by Scale's dense-captioning findings (representation > sampling, rules > reasoning, model capacity is the biggest lever, two-pass systems compound errors) |